CBSSports.com national columnist Mike Freeman ripped the Bengals on Friday for what he called "repeatedly enabling" Chris Henry.
From Freeman's column: (By the way, the gist of it is all here, in case you don't want to give Freeman and CBS the page view they're obviously desperately seeking 
There's an uncomfortable stance few have offered up about the Henry tragedy and I'm going to state it. If you want to read the syrupy and the gooey, go elsewhere.
Henry's case is sad and the blame for his demise falls on his shoulders, but the Bengals aren't far behind.
The Bengals repeatedly enabled Henry. For every Henry transgression, there was an excuse from the Bengals. For every arrest, another chance.
There was little tough love from the Bengals because they craved his talent. And if there was any player who needed a dose of tough love, it was Henry.
Someone needed to say "no" to Henry, but that's a word he rarely heard from the Bengals. Even when the Bengals finally decided that Henry's hypnotic talent shouldn't overwhelm his mini-crime sprees, releasing him in April 2008, they brought Henry back just a few months later after a rash of injuries hit their team.
If the Bengals parted ways with Henry -- permanently -- he might still be alive today because the lessons he was supposedly learning might've sunk in sooner.
It may be accurate that Henry let down his family and friends over the years, but in the end the Bengals also failed Henry.
There were many moments when the Bengals could've taken a stand against Henry which would've helped the troubled receiver with his overall life. Instead, the Bengals wagged the index finger and said, "Don't do that again."
After another arrest -- don't do that. And another -- don't do it. And again -- don't do it. The Bengals weren't providing means for Henry to become a better person because the team was too busy tracking his 40 time.
Something tells me this column (or any others along these same lines) isn't going to be very popular here in Cincinnati. What do you think about it?